Big Bear Mining v. Laxton
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BIG BEAR MINING COMPANY, Petitioner, versus GLEN R. LAXTON; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (04-154-BLA)
June 25, 2007
July 30, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ashley M. Harman, William S. Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Frederick K. Muth, HENSLEY, MUTH, GARTON & HAYES, Bluefield, West Virginia; Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor, Christian P. Barber, Helen H. Cox, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Big Bear Mining Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901945 (2000). decision is Our review of the record discloses that the Board's based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Laxton v. Big Bear Mining Co., BRB No. 04-0154-BLA We dispense with oral argument because the facts
(Nov. 16, 2004).
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?