Bishop Coal Company v. Nora L. Horne, et al
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BISHOP COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NORA L. HORNE, Surviving Spouse of David Horne; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (04-0460-BLA)
September 5, 2008
September 17, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas A. Smoot, William S. Mattingly, Kathy L. Snyder, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor, Christian P. Barber, Barry H. Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Joseph E. Wolfe, W. Andrew Delph, Jr., WOLFE, WILLIAMS & RUTHERFORD, Norton, Virginia, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Bishop Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of survivor's black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 0460-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 24, 2005). Bishop Coal Co. v. Horne, No. 04We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?