Lora v. Hollenhorst
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS M. HOLLENHORST, Virginia AUSA, personal and official capacity; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK, Special Assistant U. S. Attorney, official and personal capacity; EUGENE ROSSI, Special Assistant U. S. Attorney; TIMOTHY MCGRATH, Special Agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration, official and personal capacity, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-449-1)
July 28, 2006
August 24, 2006
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court's prior order dismissing his breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-03-449-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 24, 2005 & entered May 25, 2005). We deny Lora's motion
to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?