Spence v. Joseph S. Knecht
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CONNIE J. SPENCE, Appellant, versus JOSEPH S. KNECHT AND COMPANY, Appellee, and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-05-103-18)
July 12, 2006
August 15, 2006
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward E. Gilbert, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellant. Robert A. Kerr, Jr., Brendan P. Langendorfer, HAGOOD & KERR, PA, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Connie J. Spence appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order allowing Joseph S. Knecht and Company's claim for costs and attorney's fees incurred in the collection of its debt. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 103-18 (D.S.C. Spence v. Joseph S. Knecht & Co., No. CA-057, 2005). We have previously granted
Appellee's unopposed motion to submit this case on the briefs and therefore dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?