Sea "B" Mining Co v. DOWCP
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
SEA "B" MINING COMPANY, Petitioner, versus MAUDIA ROWE, widow of Perry Rowe; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (04-950-BLA)
July 31, 2006
August 22, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Petitioner. Maudia Rowe, Respondent Pro Se. Rita A. Roppolo, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent Director.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Sea "B" Mining Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901945 (2000). decision is Our review of the record discloses that the Board's based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Rowe v. Sea "B" Mining Co., No. 04-950-BLA (BRB We dispense with oral argument because the facts
Aug. 12, 2005).
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?