Trusty v. Jones
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ELLEN D. TRUSTY, Debtor.
-----------------------TERRY TRUSTY, Plaintiff - Appellant, ELLEN D. TRUSTY, Debtor - Appellant, versus STEPHEN D. JONES; PATRICIA DAMASCUS COMMUNITY BANK, A. MCKENZIE; Defendants - Appellees, and GERARD RICHARD VETTER, Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA05-1411-JFM; BK-01-51942; AP-01-5148)
September 29, 2006
November 14, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Trusty, Ellen D. Trusty, Appellants Pro Se. Stephen D. Jones, Appellee Pro Se; Thomas J. Althauser, ECCLESTON & WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland; Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's orders
affirming the bankruptcy court's orders denying relief in their action alleging fraud by the Defendants and seeking to reinstate a previous contract the Trustys had with Jones. We have reviewed the record and decisions of the bankruptcy court and the district court and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the See Trusty v. Jones, Nos. CA-
reasons stated by the lower courts.
05-1411-JFM; BK-01-51942; AP-01-5148 (D. Md. July 18, 2005; Sept. 15, 2005). We deny the Trustys' motion for a stay and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?