Jones v. MD National Capital

Filing 920060817

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2368 JAMES A. JONES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1818-8) Submitted: June 14, 2006 Decided: August 17, 2006 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Charles Dickerson, MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James A. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101 (2000), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 621 to 634 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Maryland-Nat'l Capital Park & Planning Comm'n, No. CA-04-1818-8 (D. Md. Oct. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?