Macklin v. Mirant Services, LLC
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES MACKLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MIRANT SERVICES, L.L.C., Defendant - Appellee, and POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-555-1)
March 13, 2008
April 8, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy B. Fleming, Keir S. Bickerstaffe, WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Neal D. Mollen, Carson H. Sullivan, Courtney Mueller, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Macklin appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Mirant Services, L.L.C., on his Title VII complaint alleging race
discrimination and retaliation.
We have reviewed the record
included on appeal and the parties' briefs and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macklin v. Mirant Servs., L.L.C., No. CAWe
05-555-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 9, 2005).
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?