Budnik v. Gonzales
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MAREK BUDNIK, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A73-554-240)
November 22, 2006
January 8, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Kristin K. Edison, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Marek Germany, Budnik, for a native of of an Poland order and of a citizen Board of of
Immigration Appeals ("Board") affirming the immigration judge's order denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which denied his application for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. We have
reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in affirming the decision of the immigration judge. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(c)(6) (West 2005); 8
C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for See In re: Budnik, No. A73-554-
the reasons stated by the Board.
240 (B.I.A. Nov. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?