Pearson v. Saar
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARY ANN SAAR, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; WILLIAM SONDERVAN, Commissioner of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-03-1705-RDB)
Submitted: September 26, 2006
Decided: September 28, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Saar, No. CA-03-1705-RDB (D. Md. July 28, 2005). oral argument because the facts and legal We have
Accordingly, we See Pearson v. We dispense with contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?