Long v. Hinkle
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RONALD D. LONG, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE M. HINKLE, Chief, Warden, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-05-374-GBL)
February 21, 2007
March 5, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Long, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ronald D. Long, Sr., appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000),* and We the have order reviewed denying the his motion and find for no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Long v. Hinkle, No. CA-05-374-GBL (E.D. Va. We
June 20, 2005; filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005).
deny Long's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
This order is a final, appealable order over which we have jurisdiction. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 344-45 (4th Cir. 2005). - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?