Lora v. Hollenhorst

Filing 920060816


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7658 WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS M. HOLLENHORST, Official Capacity; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK, Official Capacity; TIMOTHY MCGRATH, Official Capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-738-1) Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 16, 2006 Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-05-738-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 5, 2005 & entered July 6, 2005; filed Aug. 1, 2005 & entered Aug. 2, 2005). We deny Lora's motion to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?