Ingram v. Griffin

Filing 920070302

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7779 EDDIE INGRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT GRIFFIN, Shift CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KEPLER, Commander; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-622-2) Submitted: February 14, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eddie Ingram appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record, considered the Supreme Court's recent decision in Jones v. Bock, Nos. 05-7058/05-7142, 2007 WL 135890 (2007), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oct. 21, 2005). Ingram v. Griffin, No. CA-05-622-2 (E.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?