Townsend v. Baskerville
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MILTON TOWNSEND; BRUCE E. KENNEY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and JAMES TAYLOR, Plaintiff, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden; THOMAS F. NEUMAYER, Assistant Warden of Programs; MICHAEL MORLEY, Chaplain; DOROTHY COLLINS, Chief Operations of Classification & Records Unit; SHANDA DAWKINS, Senior Counselor/Program Supervisor; P. E. ANDERSON, Correctional Officer; P. M. HENICK, Regional Ombudsman; SERGEANT LEE; OFFICER WEST; CAPTAIN SCOTT; OFFICER MULLINS; LIEUTENANT BEST, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-549-3)
Submitted: June 22, 2006
Decided: June 26, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton Townsend, Bruce E. Kenney, Appellants Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Milton Townsend and Bruce E. Kenney appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Townsend v. Baskerville, No. CA-03-549-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?