Boger v. Braxton

Filing 920071108

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7831 SCOTT M. BOGER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-05-543) Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: November 8, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott M. Boger, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Scott M. Boger appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000) petition. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm Boger v. Braxton, Many of for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 7:05-cv-00543-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2005). Boger's pending motions are moot since he has been given an opportunity to respond to Appellee's brief; the remaining motions are without merit. We dispense with Thus, we deny all of Boger's pending motions. oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?