US v. Barefoot
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cv-888-H)
Submitted: September 28, 2006
Decided: October 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district
court's granting the Government's motion for summary judgment and denying Barefoot's motion to quash the Government's civil
complaint. The district court awarded the Government a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief and imposed on Barefoot a $20,000 civil fine in this case arising under 18 U.S.C. §§ 287, 1345(a) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barefoot, No. 5:04-cv-888-H (E.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
Apr. 25, 2005).
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?