Kakar v. Gonzales
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MUHAMMAD SALIM ADNAN KAKAR, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-166-826)
November 22, 2006
December 14, 2006
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew W. Rau, LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW W. RAU, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Michael J. Quinn, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Muhammad Salim Adnan Kakar, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge's denial of his request for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed
the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the See In re: Kakar, No. A72-166-826
reasons stated by the Board.
(B.I.A. Dec. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
decisional process. PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?