Smith v. Laidlaw Transit Services
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BONNIE S. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:02-cv-04179-JFA)
Submitted: August 24, 2006
Decided: August 28, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bonnie S. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Franklin Grady Shuler, Jr., TURNER & PADGETT, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Bonnie S. Smith appeals the district court's order
substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendant on Smith's federal claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and on Smith's state law claims for negligence and harassment.* find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Smith v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., No. 3:02-cv-04179-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The district court dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (2000) Smith's claim under the South Carolina Bill of Rights for Handicapped Persons. - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?