Smith v. Laidlaw Transit Services

Filing 920060828

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1124 BONNIE S. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:02-cv-04179-JFA) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 28, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bonnie S. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Franklin Grady Shuler, Jr., TURNER & PADGETT, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Bonnie S. Smith appeals the district court's order substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendant on Smith's federal claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000), and on Smith's state law claims for negligence and harassment.* find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., No. 3:02-cv-04179-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED The district court dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1367(c) (2000) Smith's claim under the South Carolina Bill of Rights for Handicapped Persons. - 2 - *

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?