Clark v. Siemens VDO Automotive
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
SANDRA D. CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (4:05-cv-00093-WDK)
March 9, 2007
April 9, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Torrino Travell Travis, LAW OFFICE OF TRAVELL TRAVIS, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana L. Rust, Kathleen M. McDaniel, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Sandra D. Clark appeals the district court's order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to grant Defendant's motion, filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b), to dismiss Clark's civil action for failure to comply with the court's order compelling Clark to attend her noticed deposition. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
Accordingly, we See Clark v.
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Siemens VDO Auto. Corp., No. 4:05-cv-00093-WDK (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2006) (accepting the findings of the magistrate judge). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?