Ardinger v. Washington County MD
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
LARRY ARDINGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WASHINGTON COUNTY, COUNTY, MARYLAND, Commissioners, MARYLAND; WASHINGTON Board of County Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:05-cv01029-AMD)
January 5, 2007
February 5, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
C. William Michaels, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Jonathan R. Topazian, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Larry Ardinger appeals the district court's order
granting summary judgment in favor of Washington County, Maryland, and the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County,
Maryland, on Ardinger's sexual harassment, gender discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ardinger v. Washington County, No. 1:05-cv-01029-AMD We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
(D. Md. Jan. 23, 2006). facts and legal before
contentions the court
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?