Bomar v. Hoke, Inc
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RICKEY W. BOMAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOKE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (7:05-cv-01527-GRA)
August 7, 2006
August 22, 2006
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rickey W. Bomar, Appellant Pro Se. Wade Edward Ballard, Matthew J. Gilley, FORD & HARRISON, LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Rickey W. Bomar seeks to appeal from the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and dismissing Bomar's complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because Bomar
could remedy his complaint's dismissal by amending the complaint to clarify his claims and the basis for federal jurisdiction, the district court's order is not reviewable. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). oral Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. because the facts and legal We dispense with contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?