Bey v. UPS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
AMAR BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED; TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 71, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cv-00208)
Submitted: August 24, 2006
Decided: August 29, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amar Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Meredith S. Jeffries, Susan Ballantine Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; John David James, SMITH, JAMES, ROWLETT & COHEN, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; James Francis Wallington, BAPTISTE & WILDER, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Amar Bey appeals the district court's order dismissing his claim that his employer violated Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA") and that his union breached its duty of fair representation regarding his termination. The
district court construed his complaint to be a "hybrid 301" action under the LMRA. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Bey v. UPS, No. 5:05-cv-00208 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 13,
district court. 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?