Lewis v. Microsoft

Filing 920070329

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1354

BRENDA D. FLOWERS,

LEWIS,

M.A.S.,

J.D.;

WILLIAM

L.

Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00343-H)

Submitted:

March 9, 2007

Decided:

March 29, 2007

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brenda D. Lewis, William L. Flowers, Appellants Pro Se. Richard L. Farley, Christopher Allen Hicks, KATTEN, MUCHIN & ROSENMAN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Timothy L. Boller, William O. Ferron, Jr., SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Brenda D. Lewis, M.A.S., J.D., and William L. Flowers, Jr., appeal the district court's order granting Microsoft

Corporation's motions for summary judgment and to dismiss, and denying relief in their civil action in which they alleged various claims concerning trademark infringement. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for Lewis v. Microsoft We dispense

the reasons stated by the district court.

Corp., No. 5:05-cv-00343-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2006).

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -