Lewis v. Microsoft

Filing 920070329


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1354 BRENDA D. FLOWERS, LEWIS, M.A.S., J.D.; WILLIAM L. Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00343-H) Submitted: March 9, 2007 Decided: March 29, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda D. Lewis, William L. Flowers, Appellants Pro Se. Richard L. Farley, Christopher Allen Hicks, KATTEN, MUCHIN & ROSENMAN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Timothy L. Boller, William O. Ferron, Jr., SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brenda D. Lewis, M.A.S., J.D., and William L. Flowers, Jr., appeal the district court's order granting Microsoft Corporation's motions for summary judgment and to dismiss, and denying relief in their civil action in which they alleged various claims concerning trademark infringement. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for Lewis v. Microsoft We dispense the reasons stated by the district court. Corp., No. 5:05-cv-00343-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2006). with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?