Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JULIO PARDO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY, LLC, a/k/a Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (1:04-cv-01709-JRM)
September 22, 2006
October 11, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julio Pardo, Appellant Pro Se. John Hagood Tighe, Edward Brandon Gaskins, FISHER & PHILLIPS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Julio Pardo appeals the district court's order granting Westinghouse Savannah River Company, LLC, summary judgment and dismissing his employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, with prejudice.* error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., LLC, No. 1:04-cv-01709-JRM (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to adjudication by a magistrate judge. - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?