Freeman v. Richland County
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WENDELL FREEMAN; DAVID JATHNIEL FREEMAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus RICHLAND COUNTY PROBATE COURT; AMY MCCULLOCH, Probate Judge; JACQUELINE D. BELTON, Associate Probate Judge; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; MARK SANFORD, Governor; TERESA LEE CLEMENT, Guardian Ad Litem, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00010-MBS)
December 21, 2006
December 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wendell Freeman, David Jathniel Freeman, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Wendell and David Jathniel Freeman appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and
recommendation and denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See Freeman v. Richland County Probate Court, No. We dispense with oral
3:06-cv-00010-MBS (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2006).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?