Witherspoon v. Gonzales
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOHNNY GUTLIP AUER WITHERSPOON, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A28-072-610)
September 20, 2006
October 19, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Gutlip Auer Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Song E. Park, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Johnny Gutlip Auer Witherspoon, a native and citizen of Liberia, petitions for review of a 2001 final administrative order of removal. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (2000), "[t]he
petition for review must be filed not later than thirty days after the date of the final order of removal." "jurisdictional in nature and must be This time period is construed with strict
fidelity to [its] terms."
Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995).
Witherspoon's petition was filed over four years after the order of removal; thus, his petition is untimely. Because we lack
jurisdiction to review the merits of Witherspoon's appeal, we dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?