Mills v. Sanders
Filing
920070309
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1536
PATRICIA B. MILLS, Administrator of the Estate of Brian Lee Mills, Decedent, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TERRANCE D. SANDERS; CARRIERS, INCORPORATED, SCHNEIDER NATIONAL Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cv-00059-JLK)
Submitted:
February 12, 2007
Decided:
March 9, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jean M. McKeen, TOMLIN & MCKEEN, Chester, Virginia, for Appellant. Eric S. Jensen, Monica A. Walker, JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Appellant Patricia B. Mills, as administrator of the estate of her son, Brian Mills, and on behalf of his estate, brought a wrongful death action under Virginia law against
Appellees Terrance D. Sanders and Schneider National Carriers, Inc. Mills asserted Sanders' negligent operation of his tractor-trailer caused it to veer from the highway and kill Brian, who was walking down the side of the road. The district court granted summary
judgment in favor of Appellees, and Mills appealed. We review the granting of summary judgment de novo. Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988). error. We have reviewed the record, and find no reversible
We therefore affirm the district court's order for the
reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. See Mills v. Sanders and Schneider Nat'l Carriers, No. 4:05-cv-00059-JLK (W.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?