Iles v. NC Agricultural Finance

Filing 920070927


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1549 WARTHELL B. ILES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MONROE ROOSEVELT PARKER, JR., Plaintiff, versus NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FINANCE AUTHORITY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 06-1550 In Re: WARTHELL B. ILES, Debtor. ----------------------------WARTHELL B. ILES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CENDANT MORTGAGE CORPORATION, d/b/a PHH Mortgage Services; NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FINANCE AUTHORITY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (4:04-cv-00079-WDK; 4:05-cv-00011-WDK; 03-53401SCD) Submitted: September 19, 2007 Decided: September 27, 2007 Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Hope Marsh, HILL, TUCKER & MARSH, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer Jo West, SPOTTS FAIN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Jeffrey L. Marks, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Warthell B. Iles appeals the district court's orders denying her motion to set aside a settlement agreement, dismissing as untimely her appeal from the bankruptcy court's order dismissing her Chapter 13 petition, and awarding attorneys' fees and costs to the Appellees. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Iles v. N.C. Agric. Fin. Auth., Nos. 4:04-cv- district court. 00079-WDK; 4:05-cv-00011-WDK (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2006 & entered Apr. 3, 2006; Apr. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?