Crawford v. Pham
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MARLA CRAWFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TONY PHAM; CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; MRS. TIMMAS; TONY RANDALL, Public Defender; SANDY LEDBETTER; CHRISTOPHER COLLINS, Esquire; MR. ETHERINGTON; HORACE HUNTER, Mr. Esquire; DAVID LASSITER, Mr. Esquire, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00209-HEH)
Submitted: November 15, 2006
Decided: November 17, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. William Woodul Tunner, THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia; Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Christopher Collins, Richmond, Virginia; William Kerfoot Lewis, BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON & ETHERINGTON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Marla Crawford appeals the district court's order
dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we Crawford v. We dispense
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pham, No. 3:06-cv-00209-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2006).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?