Laksmono v. Gonzales
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
IMAWAN LAKSMONO; FLORENSIA SHIERLY UTOMO, Petitioners, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-268-052; A96-268-053)
November 13, 2006
December 11, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew W. Rau, LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW W. RAU, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioners. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Mona Maria Yousif, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Imawan Laksmono and Florensia Shierly Utomo, both natives and citizens of Indonesia, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Laksmono, Nos. See 8 C.F.R.
A96-268-052; A96-268-053 (B.I.A. Apr. 18, 2006). oral argument because the facts and legal
We dispense with contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?