Campbell v. Potter
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DAVID A. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District District of North Carolina, at Durham. District Judge. (1:04-cv-00989-JAB)
Court for the Middle James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Submitted: September 28, 2006
Decided: October 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney; Joan Brodish Binkley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: David A. Campbell appeals the district court's order granting Defendant judgment in this employment discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Potter, No. 1:04-cv-00989-JAB We dispense with oral
(M.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2006; Apr. 20, 2006).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?