In Re: Beattie v.

Filing 920070411

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1684

In Re:

MICHAEL JACKSON BEATTIE,

Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge, James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge, and Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (3:06-mc-00002-JRS)

Submitted:

March 9, 2007

Decided:

April 11, 2007

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jackson Beattie, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Jackson Beattie appeals from an order of a threejudge panel denying his petition for reinstatement to the practice of law before the Eastern District of Virginia. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons stated by the panel. Beattie, No. 3:06-mc-00002-JRS We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm Michael Jackson 22, 2006). We

See In re: Va. May

(E.D.

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -