In Re: Beattie v.

Filing 920070411


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1684 In Re: MICHAEL JACKSON BEATTIE, Petitioner - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge, James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge, and Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (3:06-mc-00002-JRS) Submitted: March 9, 2007 Decided: April 11, 2007 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Jackson Beattie, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Jackson Beattie appeals from an order of a threejudge panel denying his petition for reinstatement to the practice of law before the Eastern District of Virginia. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons stated by the panel. Beattie, No. 3:06-mc-00002-JRS We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm Michael Jackson 22, 2006). We See In re: Va. May (E.D. dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?