Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DARLA R. FLOYD; DANA NICHOLE FLOYD, Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:04-cv-01305-GRA)
March 2, 2007
March 13, 2007
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John R. Murphy, Adam J. Neil, MURPHY & GRANTLAND, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. John Shannon Nichols, BLUESTEIN & NICHOLS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Bryan D. Ramey, BRYAN D. RAMEY & ASSOCIATES, Piedmont, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company appeals the district court's order reforming Darla Floyd's insurance policy to include underinsured motorist coverage and allowing Floyd to stack the coverage on her vehicles. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Floyd v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 6:04-
cv-01305-GRA (D.S.C. May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?