O'Connor v. Young
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM G. YOUNG, Individually and in his capacity as chief judge; MORRIS E. LASKER, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; CONRAD K. CYR, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; SANDRA L. LYNCH, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; KERMIT V. LIPEZ, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Senator; JOHN KERRY, Senator, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00331-JRS)
November 21, 2006
November 28, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn E. O'Connor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Carolyn E. O'Connor appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action against several federal judges, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and its Senators, for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny O'Connor's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See O'Connor v. Young, No. 3:06-cv-00331-JRS We dispense with oral argument because
(E.D. Va. June 22, 2006).
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?