Bangura v. Gonzales
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MUSA NABIEU BANGURA, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A73-699-795)
March 21, 2007
April 10, 2007
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kathryn L. Moore, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Musa Nabieu Bangura, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have
reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Bangura's motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2006); INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 (1988). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?