Chen v. Gonzales
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
NAN CHEN, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-744-753)
December 15, 2006
January 5, 2007
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nan Chen, Petitioner Pro Se. Carol Federighi, Daniel Eric Goldman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nan Chen, a native and citizen of the People's Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying a motion to reconsider a prior order affirming the immigration judge's denial of his
requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and
the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the See In re Chen, No. A97-744-753
reasons stated by the Board.
(B.I.A. July 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?