Shipkovitz v. Arlington County

Filing 920071011


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1897 SAMUEL SHIPKOVITZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, and STEPHEN C. CROSSAN; ANTHONY SABO, Plaintiffs, versus SHARITA HUGHES; S. KEITH GRIERSON; RON CARLEE, County of Arlington Manager; DANA WILSON; RICHARD FREEMAN; LOUISE M. DIMATTEO, Defendants - Appellees, and ARLINGTON COUNTY, Manager; ROBERT SPECK; CHAS. E. SMITH MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED; PHILIP ALMEIDA; BLACK ICE SECURITY SERVICES, INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE-I, Black Ice employee-alleged guard; WATERFORD HOUSE UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Waterford House Condominium Association, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01219-CMH) Submitted: September 24, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Shipkovitz, Appellant Pro Se. Louise Marie DiMatteo, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Arlington, Virginia; Michael Joseph Holleran, Yama Anthony Shansab, WALTON & ADAMS, PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Samuel Shipkovitz appeals a district court order granting an Appellee's motion to dismiss and a district court order granting summary judgment to the remaining Appellees and closing the case. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Shipkovitz v. Arlington County, No. 1:05-cv-01219-CMH (E.D. Va. filed May 12, 2006, entered May 17, 2006; filed June 22, 2006, entered June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?