Hughes v. Clinchfield Coal Co
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CLARA SUE HUGHES, Petitioner, versus CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (06-0138-BLA)
March 19, 2007
April 5, 2007
Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clara Sue Hughes, Petitioner Pro Se. Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Emily Goldberg-Kraft, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Clara Sue Hughes seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). decision Our review of the record discloses that the Board's is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Hughes v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 06-0138-BLA (B.R.B. July 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?