Alford v. SC Dept of Corrections

Filing 920070227


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1931 GREGORY WAYNE ALFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:04-cv-23257-CMC) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Wayne Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gregory Wayne Alford appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on his employment discrimination* and retaliation action. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Alford v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. 3:04-cv-23257-CMC (D.S.C. July 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED Alford's failure to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation as to his race discrimination claims, after proper notice of the consequences of his failure to do so, results in waiver of this issue on review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.3d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). - 2 - *

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?