Wright v. Donegal Insurance Co

Filing 920070402


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2040 STEPHEN M. WRIGHT, Individually and as Trustee, Trust FBO of Secured Creditors of Perryville Investment Group, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, and PERRYVILLE INVESTMENT Assignor/Contract Seller, GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, versus DONEGAL INSURANCE COMPANIES; LASSEN, MARINE AND WEBSTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-00827-WDQ) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen M. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Allan Wothers, Owen Joseph Curley, NILES, BARTON & WILMER, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Stephen M. Wright appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint against the Defendants. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm Wright v. Donegal Wright for the reasons stated by the district court. Ins. Cos., No. 1:06-cv-00827-WDQ (D. Md. June 7, 2006). also appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. Although the district court incorrectly construed this motion as one filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), we have reviewed the motion and the documents submitted with the motion and find that the Rule 59(e) motion was properly denied. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?