Hooper v. State of NC

Filing 920070327

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2121 DEONA RENNA HOOPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY; NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY CAMPUS POLICE; JAMES H. AMMONS, IV, North Carolina Central University Chancellor, in his official capacity; CHIEF MCDONALD VICK, Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacity; CAPTAIN VICTOR O. INGRAM, in his individual and official capacity; CAPTAIN JOSEPH N. HILLIARD, in his individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT MICHAEL WATLINGTON, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-00014-NCT) Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 27, 2007 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deona Renna Hooper, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Ziko, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kimberly Dean Potter, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Deona Renna Hooper appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hooper v. North Carolina, No. 1:04-cv-00014-NCT (M.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the facts Oct. 3, 2006). and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?