Lowery v. Barnhart
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES V. LOWERY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge. (1:05cv-03424-BPG)
August 29, 2007
September 14, 2007
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey R. Scholnick, HOOD & SCHOLNICK, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James V. Lowery appeals the magistrate judge's order affirming benefits.* the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance
We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the
decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 We have thoroughly reviewed the
F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996).
materials submitted in the joint appendix and the parties' briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Lowery We
v. Barnhart, No. 1:05-cv-03424-BPG (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2006).
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?