Mayer v. Social Security

Filing 920070522

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2265 JAMES P. MAYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (7:06-cv-00054-FL) Submitted: April 30, 2007 Decided: May 22, 2007 Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James P. Mayer, Appellant Pro Se. Marian Ashley Harder, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James P. Mayer appeals the district court's order granting the Commissioner's motion to dismiss Mayer's action for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income payments. Mayer's application was dismissed because a previous final decision concerning Mayer's entitlement to benefits on the same facts and on the same issues had been entered. 404.957(c) (2005). review the See 20 C.F.R. A district court has no jurisdiction to res judicata claim decisions of a unless the Commissioner's raised a claimant has colorable constitutional Mayer has violation. Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). raised no such claim. reversible error. order. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm the district court's See Mayer v. Barnhart, No. 7:06-cv-00054-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. We also deny Mayer's motion for monthly benefit 15, 2006). payments. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?