US v. Nelson
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LAWRENCE W. NELSON, a/k/a Zikee, Defendant - Appellant.
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. (S. Ct. No. 08-5657)
May 29, 2009
July 7, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher A. Davis, DAVIS LAW OFFICES, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Sharon L. Potter, United States Attorney, Zelda E. Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: In United States v. Nelson, 276 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2008), we affirmed Lawrence W. Nelson's 360-month sentence
imposed by the district court after a jury convicted Nelson of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than § fifty 846 grams of crack cocaine, a in violation for of 21 of and
remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007), and Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007). Ct. 890 (2009). See Nelson v. United States, 129 S.
Upon further consideration, we vacate Nelson's
sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Nelson. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED
We note that, in his original appeal, Nelson also challenged his conviction on several grounds. Because the Supreme Court's opinion remanding the case does not affect the issues Nelson raised with regard to his conviction, we reinstate our prior opinion affirming his conviction. See United States v. Nelson, 237 F. App'x 819, 820-21 (4th Cir. 2007).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?