US v. Sealed Defendant
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SEALED DEFENDANT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:04-mj-00063)
Submitted: November 21, 2006
November 29, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sealed Defendant, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: The Sealed Defendant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for suppression of a search warrant and for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sealed Defendant, No. We dispense with oral
1:04-mj-00063 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2006).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?