US v. Sealed Defendant

Filing 920061129

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4665

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SEALED DEFENDANT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:04-mj-00063)

Submitted: November 21, 2006

Decided:

November 29, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sealed Defendant, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: The Sealed Defendant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for suppression of a search warrant and for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sealed Defendant, No. We dispense with oral

1:04-mj-00063 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2006).

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -