US v. Harris
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY GENE HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cr-00008-jlk-12)
Submitted: July 24, 2007
July 26, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rena Berry, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Anthony P. Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Larry Gene Harris pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to two counts of conspiracy to launder money, in The
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) (2000) (Counts 7 and 10).
district court sentenced Harris to 132 months' imprisonment on Counts 7 and 10, to be served concurrently, three years of
supervised release on each count, to be served concurrently, and ordered payment of a $200 statutory assessment. Harris appeals his sentence only, asserting error in the district court's factual determination of the amount of money attributed to him in the conspiracy and in its denial of his motion for downward departure due to his physical and mental condition. The Government claims We affirm.
Harris waived his right to appeal his sentence.*
A defendant may waive the right to appeal if that waiver is knowing and intelligent. 169 (4th Cir. 2005). United States v. Blick, 408 F.3d 162,
Generally, if the district court fully
questions a defendant regarding the waiver of his right to appeal during the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 colloquy, the waiver is both valid and enforceable. Cir. 2005); United States v. Johnson, 410 F.3d 137, 151 (4th
United States v. Wessells, 936 F.2d 165, 167-68 (4th
Cir. 1991). The question of whether a defendant validly waived his
Harris' plea agreement contained an express waiver as to the district court's factual findings as to the value of the laundered funds, and a comprehensive waiver of his "right of appeal as to any and all issues in this case. . .." - 2 -
right to appeal is a question of law that we review de novo. Blick, 408 F.3d at 168. The record reveals, and Harris does not
contest, that he knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal. Moreover, the sentencing issues Harris attempts to raise
on appeal fall within the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we affirm Harris' conviction and dismiss the appeal of his sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?