Smith v. Harrison
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
HAROLD SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEVE HARRISON, Associate Warden; FRANK SPOON, Factory Manager; JERRY DEMPSEY, Foreman; MONROE, Foreman; RICKY GAULT, Foreman; ELMORE BUTCH HARRIS, Assistant Safety Manager; JOHN DOE, Property Owner; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-1188-6)
November 21, 2006
November 29, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se. THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Appellees.
Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF Columbia, South Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Harold Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the Smith v. Harrison, No. CA-
reasons stated by the district court.
04-1188-6 (D.S.C. Dec. 7, 2005). Smith's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
contentions the court
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?