Smith v. Harrison

Filing 920061129

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6040

HAROLD SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEVE HARRISON, Associate Warden; FRANK SPOON, Factory Manager; JERRY DEMPSEY, Foreman; MONROE, Foreman; RICKY GAULT, Foreman; ELMORE BUTCH HARRIS, Assistant Safety Manager; JOHN DOE, Property Owner; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-1188-6)

Submitted:

November 21, 2006

Decided:

November 29, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se. THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Appellees.

Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF Columbia, South Carolina, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Harold Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the Smith v. Harrison, No. CA-

reasons stated by the district court.

04-1188-6 (D.S.C. Dec. 7, 2005). Smith's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

contentions the court

materials

would

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -