Marshall v. Rushton
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ELIJAH MARSHALL, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE RUSHTON; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:05-cv-00345-GRA)
April 28, 2006
June 22, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elijah Marshall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Elijah Marshall, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Marshall,
however, waived his right to appeal by failing timely to file objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997). dismiss the appeal. Id. at 200. See Wells v. We therefore
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?