US v. Ponzini
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT LOUIS PONZINI, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00423-JRS)
June 16, 2006
June 30, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Louis Ponzini, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Robert Louis Ponzini appeals the district court's order denying Ponzini's 28 U.S.C. § 3742 (2000) motion for want of jurisdiction. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ponzini, No. 3:02-cr-00423We dispense with oral argument
JRS (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2005).
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?