Pearson v. US District Court MD
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:05-cv-03317-RDB)
Submitted: September 26, 2006
Decided: September 29, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the Accordingly, we See
record and find that the appeal is frivolous.
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Pearson v. U.S. Dist. Ct., Md., No. 1:05-cv-03317-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?